In fact, it is often the case that a couple of dealings with "foreigners" to begin during the engagement. These "outside" things are a lot of public attention during the war and were generally thought not only to the war of aberrations, but as a great many social phenomena, which appeared to be products of war, because they were much more visible. In fact, almost a branch of a couple of these relationships are typical of complete and accompanied by a couple of things.
It must not be imagined, however, that only a couple of relationships with important consequences for a couple of other potential mates. Again, it is often supposed to be special features (in this case, the "rogue"), love stories are largely owned by the dyadic relationship itself. A young engaged couple can have a strong relationship with his mother, father, brother or sister, a friend of her age and sex.
Although none of these possibilities in our society is a heterosexual love object suitable for him, but a couple of relationships with one or more of these have an impact on relations between the bride and himself - in most cases the consequences are not substantially different from that emitted by the non-love thing. The relationship between a couple of people, in general, are usually exclusive, all-or-nothing quality with regard to the sentiments and loyalty to the two people. Therefore, the coexistence of a report of the second pair is only involved in one of the partners has a tendency to pose a threat to anyone except in relation to some form of arrangement has evolved.
In our attempt to understand the course of development in dyadic committed, it is important to note how external dyads invades the relationship between the two. There are three general types of interaction possible in this social setting: (1) In the first, no division, deliberate or not, two or more dyadic relations. (A) if intentional, a person in each pair of attempts to maintain relationships with a couple hidden from the person involved in the other. (B)
On the other hand, dyadic relationships in the two "social worlds", so that the split is not required given the nature of social situations. (2) In the second general form of interaction, the two couple relationships quite socially visible and tend to actively compete for the loyalty and commitment of a person that is common to both. (3) In the third type, a person either (a) seek to "occupy" or (b) is pulled, the dyadic relationship of others to form a group of three, a triad.
To avoid reinforcing the popular sentiment that interfere without love is generic and qualitatively distinct from other dyadic influence the development of the report of a couple, we will illustrate each of these generic types with a single case where examples are beyond the scope of what is commonly spoken of with great innuendo that "triangle".
Young woman, Roberta S., worked as a stenographer is a beautiful young woman lawyer, Miss P. During the three years he had become much more than a working relationship. They had come to discuss almost all of their personal affairs with each other and had developed a great relationship and solidarity. Robert became engaged to marry George R., a young businessman, a city whose business is a strange coincidence Roberta transparent control of the employer of the woman.
Even knowing that George was working quite ignorant of the fact that many of his business was visible or lawyer who is a close personal relationship with the lawyer and his wife. Roberta his secret that he and his employer have exchanged mutual trust. Miss P., slightly larger than unmarried woman leaned heavily assistant Roberta and mutual support. More or less consciously, he keeps approaching marriage is a direct threat to their emotional security, as it would deprive him of his confidant. So he tried to use the information to damage his business George. Consciously, he said that this might be true, and sometimes tried to compensate this unconscious tendency to try to take a "neutral view" towards the issue of youth.
Overall, however, his relationship with Roberta were likely to increase positive feelings and negative alternate, respectively, and couple relationships.
Roberta had a previous best platonic attachment with a teacher during his studies. She had brilliant work in psychology, her major field. His work attracted the attention of Professor B., head of the department of psychology, when she was a junior and in his senior year, she received a position as a research assistant, an honor usually reserved for students. As the work product of this year a record under their joint authorship has been published in a psychological journal. Despite Dr. B. the extreme protests Roberta declined to return to university to do academic work as a boy, and hope to get into the law later.
Three years later, the university has received a sizable grant with which to continue research in an area where he was most concerned. Dr. B. called him several times and her boyfriend George R. more than once, delaying marriage, two or three years so that he could return to the University as a graduate student to help research. Although this proposal was rejected, the decision came after much debate and emotion of rotation, which has had a significant impact on the relationship with the couple.
Third triple of the relationship between patent families, which helped the couple with the father of Roberta. He was the youngest of three children and the only son still living at home with their parents. It was a favorite of the entire childhood of his father, a man known as a professional community. When she became engaged to George, his mother, who had professional ambitions, and his daughter had been a pretty cool idea for this game, but his father had been very satisfied. During the engagement he had many discussions with a couple of brilliant. There are three or four times he was driving to Chicago to see plays and had to be treated in one way or another involved in a number of them to see the "Big Nine" of football.
They often discussed their future plans with them and in these discussions, which always seemed to evolve the way to inject their own role in their future life. He and George seemed to "speak the same language." Inevitably, however, that the plans of young couples sometimes in conflict with it. When were the places without it, or have made plans for marriage that conflicts with his plans for them, was wounded and became cold and distant feature. When that happened, he turned to his wife for emotional comfort support their arguments against marriage, or other means to show their arrogance.
In the language of sociology could say they worked hard to make the dyad in the development of a triad, an attempt which in turn was accepted and rejected, but these alternatives in environments that reflect had implications for all partners involved in this particular case. In this scheme, we have, for simplicity, ignored outside of dyadic relationships in which the young man in question was caught. Suffice it to say that the couple finally has produced two reports clearly stronger than that characterizes a couple of other relationships in which everyone was involved.
It should be clear by now that the development of the couple relationship between two countries committed people who do not take place in a vague, rudimentary context of "absence of social relations." Rather than weaving a large part of the texture very personal accessories, especially Dyad, which has distinctive patterns and "limits" of their own. Like any relationship between two people develops in this type of configuration, bound, from time to time, to assume the character rather than a dyad, but rather a triad, with partners in relationships other pair to participate in one way or another intra-pair interaction.
The striking feature of the triad is that it tends to be unstable social group. Anyone who has observed the behavior of a group of three children playing together over a long period may have noticed a trend in this group to assign a dyad plus one outsider. This is just as safe for adults triads, because it is triadic play groups in children.
The principle of least interest, first formulated by EA Ross and later developed in the late Willard Waller, is likely to operate with more effect in the group of three people in the group of two persons, whose analysis done Waller that the widespread use of computers. It is very rare for a group of three parties is characterized by an equal interest and loyalty between the three members. It is almost inevitable that someone among the three who want to bring the other two combined, while the other two, roughly equal, but they can be mated with the first, only moderate and more or less interest in the other, mitigated by the jealousy they feel toward each other on their desires exclusivity to the first. Or, as in the case of the father of Roberta, in the case cited above, a three person may try to "crash" of the exclusivity of the couple relationship to develop between existing and the other two.
Again, one of the three dominates the two others, individually, yes, it can use as the primary means of reading the devotion of dominance against each other, with anything that could lead the way in imbalance of loyalty and attachment. In one case, it is clear that the person characterized by at least interested in the other two are able to operate one or two of them. In fact, as has the slightest interest in any of the other two, he is able to devote to this person control the most powerful all - exclusion - assuming he has no doubt the loyalty of the third person.
It is, by nature of the triad, then, that its existence is low, its structure is unstable and precarious balance. Cohesion is constantly threatened by jealousy and intrigue potential as a game of power and exclusion. Note that everything will work as an identification symbol for only two of the three is a symbol of automatic exclusion for the third. Certainly "on true love never did run smooth," not because it is the nature of true love, but because it is the nature of a Dyad development of any kind, taken a whirlwind of Dyad others for whom the new relationship, but a threat of disruption to the third person to report relationships.
0 comments:
Post a Comment