Competition and jealousy are the essential features of group life. Competition is always governed by some regulations. It will ultimately lead to the target had struggled to become the property of the winner. Subsequently, the company of another person to make it a sin than the competition and raises the reactions of jealousy. Why can not love a "free good", like water in the river and the air we breathe? The alleged absence of an artificially created in some cultures?
If a man wants to love a woman is probably always a group that wants too much, and then the power may not always be identified with a call for greater effort for a little 'research. Immediate response is, of course, that we value the uniqueness and monogamy. But monogamy has always violated to some extent, what man has not learned all these years to change this perfect enough to love more free and generous, which should then be possible?
Possessiveness in romantic relationships have roots deeper than those resulting from a particular culture. It can be regarded as "sub-culture." This does not mean it is innate in every human nature, but it stems from the essential nature of the groups and the remaining biological forces. It is among the animals have no values or ideals.
To prevent the development of possessive behavior, they need much more than enough to go around. Many animals and people hoard and the private guard of the supply of various goods of life, even if the entire presentation here is a distributed memory is well above the needs of current activities. You learn that his possession of the device to avoid the risk of having to find something for a while ', especially when you need it. When all of our important personal satisfactions, then held by such person, including adequate system of rules and punishments, it makes us feel a bit 'to protect the person takes a second or escape during our absence. Slavery is a crude form of a man in possession of a man, but marriage, engagement, and even an agreement to "keep steady company" subject to varying degrees, all expressions of this fundamental human rights group caused by the tendency claims to play.
The same competitive forces acting on women, and there is just enough men to go around or less than enough, women also try to get possessive rights, or security. But the net result of these two processes - the competition of men and women and competition from women to men - is to place both sexes in a very strange situation. In almost all human communities and mammals, dominant females and males are more active competitors. This inequality is essentially due to the superior physical power of men. For example, only the rape of the human male.
This superiority of man is not necessarily in large part is not true of everyone and all occasions. But the processes of social interaction often build and implement a big difference in a biological social difference moderate and fluctuating. If a conquest to another person in the first meeting, or in most cases, it develops habits of domination and losers will develop habits of submission. You can continue to live by these habits, even after the report of his physical strength has changed. The same principle applies to groups and classes of people. In humans, these modes of interaction tend to be cultural and thus even more to crystallize the situation of people.
If a man wants to love a woman is probably always a group that wants too much, and then the power may not always be identified with a call for greater effort for a little 'research. Immediate response is, of course, that we value the uniqueness and monogamy. But monogamy has always violated to some extent, what man has not learned all these years to change this perfect enough to love more free and generous, which should then be possible?
Possessiveness in romantic relationships have roots deeper than those resulting from a particular culture. It can be regarded as "sub-culture." This does not mean it is innate in every human nature, but it stems from the essential nature of the groups and the remaining biological forces. It is among the animals have no values or ideals.
To prevent the development of possessive behavior, they need much more than enough to go around. Many animals and people hoard and the private guard of the supply of various goods of life, even if the entire presentation here is a distributed memory is well above the needs of current activities. You learn that his possession of the device to avoid the risk of having to find something for a while ', especially when you need it. When all of our important personal satisfactions, then held by such person, including adequate system of rules and punishments, it makes us feel a bit 'to protect the person takes a second or escape during our absence. Slavery is a crude form of a man in possession of a man, but marriage, engagement, and even an agreement to "keep steady company" subject to varying degrees, all expressions of this fundamental human rights group caused by the tendency claims to play.
The same competitive forces acting on women, and there is just enough men to go around or less than enough, women also try to get possessive rights, or security. But the net result of these two processes - the competition of men and women and competition from women to men - is to place both sexes in a very strange situation. In almost all human communities and mammals, dominant females and males are more active competitors. This inequality is essentially due to the superior physical power of men. For example, only the rape of the human male.
This superiority of man is not necessarily in large part is not true of everyone and all occasions. But the processes of social interaction often build and implement a big difference in a biological social difference moderate and fluctuating. If a conquest to another person in the first meeting, or in most cases, it develops habits of domination and losers will develop habits of submission. You can continue to live by these habits, even after the report of his physical strength has changed. The same principle applies to groups and classes of people. In humans, these modes of interaction tend to be cultural and thus even more to crystallize the situation of people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment